<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Charles Darwin - a Man, a Mission, did he succeed?</title>
	<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me</link>
	<description>Charles Darwin - Just Another Monkey?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 04:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Creationists base beliefs primarily on science</title>
		<description><![CDATA[


  

Foley, Minnesota – March 31, 2009 – It is widely thought that creationists base their beliefs on the Bible alone rather than on scientific evidence. However, the results of a recent survey taken by one of the oldest creationism organizations in the U.S. revealed that the primary reason creationists reject evolution is scientific [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/creationists-base-beliefs-primarily-on-science</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Early 1970s</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ Bone Inventory (1971). A complete listing of all the Australopithecine finds, up to the end of 1971, was printed in a new book. This included all the African bones of our &#8220;half-ape/half-human ancestors&#8221; (*Time-Life, The Missing Link, Vol. 2). Although over 1,400 specimens are described, most are little more than scraps of bone or isolated [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/the-early-1970s</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Late 1960s</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Wistar Institute Symposium (1966). A milestone meeting was the four-day Wistar Institute Symposium, held in Philadelphia in April 1966. A number of mathematicians, familiar with biological problems, spoke—and clearly refuted neo-Darwinism in several ways. An important factor was that large computers were by this time able to work out immense calculations—showing that evolution could [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/the-late-1960s</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Early 1960s</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Revolt in France (early 1960s). A large number of French biologists and taxonomists (species classification experts) rebelled against the chains of the evolutionary creed and declared that they would continue their research, but would no longer try to prove evolution—which they considered an impossible theory. Taxonomists who joined the revolt took the name &#8220;cladists&#8221; (*Z. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/the-early-1960s</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Late 1950s happenings</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ Courville’s Research (1956). After 15 years of careful research, Donovan A. Courville, a Loma Linda University biochemist, published an important book, Exodus Problem and Its Ramifications. Courville correlated ancient Egyptian and Bible events and dates, providing us with one of the best ancient chronologies available. He showed that Manetho’s king-lists overlapped, resulting in a major [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/late-1950s-happenings</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>DNA Discovery</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ Discovery of DNA (1953). *Rosiland Franklin took some special photographs which were used in 1953 by *Francis Crick and *James Watson (without giving her credit), to develop the astounding helix model of the DNA molecule. DNA has crushed the hopes of biological evolutionists; for it provides clear evidence that every species is locked into its [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/dna-discovery</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Piltdown Skull Debunked</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ Chinese Communism (1950-). When the communists took control of China in 1950, the first new text introduced into all the schools was neither Marxist nor Leninist, but Darwinian. Chinese communist leaders eagerly grasped evolutionary theory as a basic foundation for their ideology. The government established the Paleontological Institute in Beijing, with a large staff of [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/piltdown-skull-debunked</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The First Changeover</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ First Causal Changeover (1940s). *Darwin originally wrote that random activity naturally selects itself into improvements (a concept which any sensible person will say is totally impossible). In a later book (Descent of Man, 1871), Darwin abandoned &#8220;natural selection&#8221; as hopeless, and returned to Lamarckism (the scientifically discredited inheritance of acquired characteristics; if you build strong [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/first-changeover</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The battle continues</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ Coelacanth Discovered (1938). It was once an &#8220;index fossil, used to date a sedimentary strata. Evolutionists declared it as having been dead for 70 million years. If their strata theory was correct, no living specimens could occur, since no coelacanth fossils had been found in the millions of years of higher strata. But then, on [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/battle-continues</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>More history</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ American Humanist Association (1933). &#8220;Humanism&#8221; is the modern word for &#8220;atheism.&#8221; As soon as it was formed in 1933, the AHA began working closely with science federations, to promote evolutionary theory and, with the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), to provoke legal action in the courts forcing Americans to accept evolutionary beliefs. Signatories included *Julian [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.charlesdarwin.me/more-history</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

